|
Concrete moisture
and surface alkalinity testing are essential in the determination of the suitability
of a concrete slab to receive a moisture-sensitive floor covering or
coating. These tests should be
performed on all concrete slabs regardless of their age or grade
level.
Most
U.S. producers of floor coverings, adhesives, and resinous coatings
specify testing for the Moisture Vapor Emission Rate (MVER) of a
concrete floor slab and/or the Equilibrium Relative Humidity (ERH) in concrete floor
slabs to
determine level of dryness and suitability for the installation of their
products. ASTM International has
written industry standards for testing the moisture of a concrete
slab.
ASTM
F1869-04 Standard Test Method for Measuring Moisture Vapor
Emission Rate of Concrete Subfloor Using Anhydrous Calcium Chloride.
ASTM
F2170-02 Test Method for Determining Relative Humidity in
Concrete Floor Slabs Using In-Situ Probes.
ASTM
F2420-05 Standard Test
Method for Determining Relative Humidity on the Surface of Concrete
Floor Slabs Using Relative Humidity Probe Measurement and Insulated
Hood.
ASTM
F710-08
Standard
Practice for Preparing Concrete Floors to Receive Resilient
Flooring offers recommendations regarding the suitability of a concrete
slab for the installation of resilient floor coverings based on
results achieved by these test methods. This standard states that
moisture vapor emission, per ASTM F1869, should not exceed 3 pounds
per 1,000 square feet per 24 hours, unless otherwise specified by the
flooring or adhesive manufacturer. The standard continues by stating
that relative humidity inside of a concrete slab should not exceed
75%, per ASTM F2170, unless otherwise specified by the flooring or
adhesive manufacturer.
|
Madewell-UsedByBellCSGwithPermission.gif)
|
Madewell-UsedByBellCSGwithPermission.gif)
|
|
“Apparent”
moisture vapor emission rate can change Graphic
courtesy of Madewell |
|
Moisture:
Moisture
within slabs is prone to movement when temperature and humidity
change, so testing for both relative humidity and moisture
vapor emission is strongly recommended. Our agency can perform tests by
both of these methods but it should be noted that any testing method
has limitations and can NOT offer a guarantee of a long-term successful floor
covering installation. No test can reveal everything that
should be considered when making a decision about the installation of
a floor covering or coating. Test results can only indicate a snapshot of
the slab condition of a particular spot at the time
of testing. Moisture vapor emissions are subject to seasonal fluctuations
and any subsequent damages are beyond the control of the testing agency and the
installation contractor. Changes in the interior environment, concrete slab, and subslab environments subsequent
to testing may cause conditions to change and lead to flooring
failures.
Before
discussing the individual test methods, it is important to note that
in our opinion, all existing test methods are capable of being
"fooled" under certain conditions. An example, when a
very porous concrete, or a concrete mix design with a high
water/cement ratio, is placed without the protection of an effective
sub-slab vapor retarder or barrier, concrete moisture content and vapor emission
can vary dramatically with seasons or other changing conditions. There
have been studies published that show an effect of installing floor
coverings or coatings with limited permeability is that of increasing
moisture content in concrete, when a sub-slab moisture source is
available.
A typical example is when a warehouse area is converted to office space.
Moisture Vapor Emissions Rate (MVER)
testing results prior to the flooring installation meet the
specifications required by the floor covering or coating manufacturer so a new floor
is installed.
Soon after installation, the flooring or its adhesive system fails
and subsequent tests are performed. The new tests reveal MVER levels far higher than the original test results and the
inevitable finger pointing ensues. The concrete surface in
the open warehouse had in fact dried sufficiently to reveal MVER levels low enough to pass the requirements of a flooring
manufacturer. After the concrete subfloor is covered, moisture content in the
concrete may begin to rise and can cause a failure of the floor system. The in-situ relative humidity test can, in many
instances, detect this problem as it is reading within the slab.
This
problem can also be seen when broadloom carpet is replaced with sheet
goods or wood products or with the installation of a coatings. There should always be concern
when covering or coating concrete that is not protected by an
effective sub-slab vapor retarder. Many flooring manufacturers specifically require the existence of a sub-slab vapor
retarder beneath slab-on-grade concrete when their materials are to be
installed or the installation of a topical moisture remediation
system.
Moisture Vapor Emission Rate
(MVER):
The Anhydrous
Calcium Chloride (CaCl2) Moisture Vapor Emission Test was developed to
quantify the amount of moisture vapor emission from a
concrete slab. ASTM F1869-04 is the most current
edition of this testing protocol. This test measures the amount of
moisture absorbed by the calcium chloride, over a known area of
concrete (dome area), over a known period of time (60-72 hours).
The test is performed by placing a quantity
of calcium chloride in an open dish and placing the dish on a clean,
abraded concrete surface. The dish is covered by a dome of approximately
9" x 9" and 2" in height. This dome is sealed to the
concrete to isolate the test area. The test apparatus is left undisturbed for a period of from 60
to 72 hours. At the end of the test period, the dish is retrieved and
any weight gain of the dish is attributed to moisture leaving the
concrete and being absorbed by the calcium chloride. A mathematical
formula converts this data to a result providing the number of pounds
of moisture vapor emissions per 1000 square feet per 24 hour period.
Although results
of calcium chloride testing are accepted by most U.S. manufacturers of
floor covering, adhesive and resinous coating products as a benchmark for concrete dryness and suitability for the installation of
their products, it is becoming a less preferred test method. As noted above ASTM F710 contains the statement that
concrete can be considered suitably dry when the moisture vapor emission
rate does not
exceed 3 lbs. of water per 1,000 sq. ft. per 24 hours, when tested in
accordance with test method ASTM F1869. The testing density required
is a minimum of 3 tests
for the
first 1,000 sq. ft. with one additional test for each additional
1,000 sq. ft. of concrete slab surface or fraction thereof.
The
subject building must be acclimated at or near the ambient temperature
and relative humidity levels anticipated during occupancy or use. This
is often a difficult requirement to meet on a new construction
project. If
these conditions cannot be met, the ASTM standard offers tolerances
which, at a minimum, should be honored if accurate test results are
anticipated. If the HVAC system is not operational at the time of testing
a recording hygrometer should be used to monitor and record
ambient temperature and relative humidity levels for comparison to
intended occupancy conditions. Significant variance between the environmental conditions
prior to and during testing vs. the environment conditions of the
intended use can result in
unreliable or erroneous test data. As discussed in the About Moisture section, the
vapor pressure differential, created by temperature and humidity have
a direct controlling influence on moisture vapor movement.
|

|
|
|
Graphic
courtesy of CTLGroup |
|
Some
issues with the
Calcium Chloride test
-
Snapshot, no trend, short term response
-
Susceptible to temperature and relative humidity (RH)
-
Higher
ambient temperature and relative humidity =
higher apparent MVER
-
Lower
ambient temperature and relative humidity = lower apparent
MVER
-
Higher
floor temperature = higher MVER
-
Lower
floor temperature = lower MVER
-
Affected
by the water/cement ratio
-
Measures
only top 3/4" depth
of slab
-
Cannot distinguish lightweight aggregate
moisture reservoir
-
Underestimates
high MVER levels and overestimates low MVER levels
-
Cannot distinguish between presence or absence of a vapor retarder
Calcium
chloride tests reflect moisture vapor emission from the surface of the
concrete. It has been suggested that the test reflects moisture in the
top 3/4 inch of the slab's thickness with 90% of the measured MVER
coming from the top 1/2 inch of the slab. If ambient environmental
conditions immediately preceding testing have been extremely dry or
wet, the concrete surface may be affected and test results may be
skewed accordingly.
Testing
on an open or breathing concrete surface may not reflect moisture
deep within or directly below the concrete slab. Once covered by a low
permeability floor covering or coating, concrete moisture content will equalize
within the thickness of the slab. This may result in a higher moisture
level in contact with the floor covering or coating at the surface of
the concrete slab after installation than what was originally anticipated.
Surface
contaminants and residue from paint, adhesive, curing or parting
compounds can reduce vapor emission at the test site and produce
inaccurate test results. Some penetrating parting compounds (tilt-up
construction) or penetrating cure and seal products are difficult to
detect and impossible to remove. They restrict moisture release and
result in reduced vapor emission test results. It has been found that some of these products will slowly degrade leading to latent
moisture release from the concrete and eventual floor covering or
coating system
failure.
Concrete
Relative Humidity Testing:
Relative Humidity (RH) testing of
concrete slabs has been used extensively in Australia, New Zealand,
Scandinavia, and the United Kingdom. There are two types of concrete RH
test methods, internal slab (in-situ) RH and surface RH.
The American Heritage® Science
Dictionary defines relative humidity as "The ratio of the
actual amount of water vapor present in a volume of air at a given
temperature to the maximum amount that the air could hold at that
temperature, expressed as a percentage. Warm air can hold more water
vapor than cool air, so a particular amount of water vapor will yield
a lower relative humidity in warm air than it does in cool air." (Copyright
© 2002 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin
Company. All rights reserved.)
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
defines relative humidity –noun the amount of water vapor in the
air, expressed as a percentage of the maximum amount that the air
could hold at the given temperature; the ratio of the actual water
vapor pressure to the saturation vapor pressure. Abbreviation: RH, rh (Based
on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.)
In-situ
Relative Humidity Testing:
The ASTM standard for in-situ RH
testing is designated F2170-02 and follows similar procedures
used in Europe. After side-by-side
testing with calcium chloride kits, our firm believes that the
In-Situ RH data is more useful and meaningful than calcium chloride
test results although both test methods are recommended since they
provide different data.
It
is our field experience that in-situ probes for the testing of slab-on-grade concrete
offer results which are less impacted by ambient temperature and relative
humidity conditions than the calcium chloride test. This generates meaningful data under conditions that may not be acceptable for
calcium chloride testing. Concrete slabs in contact with the earth are
a heat sink and their internal temperature is affected by both the
sub-slab soil temperature and by the temperature of the air space
above. Whereas the internal temperature of suspended concrete will be
driven by the temperature of the air space above and below the slab.
|

|
| Graph showing
data logged RH changes over time |
It
must be noted that ASTM F2170 states that slabs, which are to be
tested should be "at service temperature and the occupied air
space above the floor slab shall be at service temperature and service
relative humidity for at least 48 hours before making relative
humidity measurements in the concrete slab." Testing density required
is a minimum of 3
tests for up to 1,000 square feet, with one additional test per
each additional 1,000 square feet of concrete slab surface or fraction
thereof.
This testing standard requires drilling holes to a depth
based on a percentage of the slab's
thickness.
The hole is then lined with a plastic sleeve and a humidity sensor is
installed or the sleeve is capped.
The test site must be permitted to equalize for 72 hours prior to
reading equilibrium relative humidity levels. After or during acclimation or
equilibration, a probe is placed in the sleeve that permits readings
to be obtained from the bottom of the hole, thereby offering a method
to measure moisture content inside of the concrete slab reported as a
relative humidity level.
Engius-UsedByBellCSGroupWithPermission.gif) |
|
| Example of an in-situ probe |
|
Testing
performed at multiple depths permits a testing agency to develop a
profile of moisture conditions through the thickness of a concrete
slab. This information permits the user to make a more informed
decision regarding the installation of floor coverings or the need to
consider other alternatives.
It is critically important that probe
temperature is at equilibration with concrete slab temperature.
Testing should take place in an acclimated building and at the same
density as noted above.
This test method is less subject to
conditions occurring at the concrete surface that may influence
calcium chloride test results. Test
results appear to be less impacted by the type of, or lack of, floor
coverings in place prior to testing.
Most
resilient floor covering manufacturers recognize ASTM F710-03, which
states in Section 5.2.2 "In accordance with Test Method ASTM
F2170, the relative humidity in a concrete floor slab shall not exceed
75% at the time of testing, unless otherwise specified by the flooring
or adhesive manufacturer." A listing of many of the manufactures who have adopted
the ASTM F2170 test method in their specifications can be found here.
The
flooring industry is seeing data developed by testing agencies that are not following
the ASTM F2170 protocol, particularly with regard to equalizing of the
test hole and/or test probe. Without temperature equilibration of the
test site and testing apparatus, the data generated may be skewed high or
low relative to the direction of inequity, thus rendering data
collected misleading or meaningless.
Our
testing agency uses instruments from various manufactures to perform
testing in accordance to ASTM F2170 standards. This allows us to
provide our clients with a diversity of technologies to perform testing.
Our equipment includes testing instruments that allow us to provide
not only snapshot readings but also automated data logging of the relative humidity and temperature trend
recordings of the internal slab conditions and ambient environment.
Insulated
Hood
Relative Humidity Testing:
A
newer testing method to the U.S. is the insulated hood relative humidity
method which like the in-situ relative humidity method, has been
previously used in Europe. The ASTM F2170 and F2420 both measure the
equilibrium relative humidity and temperature. The hood method measures
the equilibrium relative humidity and temperature directly above the
surface of the concrete slab. Relative humidity readings from the hood method tend to be
about five percent lower
than those from the in-situ method.
The
hood method measures the amount of free water in the air directly
above the concrete surface and the
calcium chloride method measures how much vapor is being emitted from the
surface. One of the reasons humidity testing of concrete is becoming
specified more often is that these methods are not as sensitive to atmospheric
conditions as with the MVER method.
The
hood test method consists of securing an insulated air tight box to a bare concrete
surface and the equilibrium relative humidity and temperature within the box is obtained through a
probe which is inserted into the box. Like with the other moisture
tests, the occupied air
space above the test area shall be at service temperature and service
relative humidity for at least 48 hours before making relative
humidity measurements. This method is very good for those situations
where drilling may not be advisable.
Alkalinity/pH
Testing:
Testing
for alkalinity is often overlooked but of extreme importance to a successful
installation and like with moisture testing, it should be conducted on
all floor regardless of the grade or age. pH is a measurement of
hydrogen ion concentration that indicates the acidity or alkalinity
(base)
of a solution. ASTM F710 states that the surface of a concrete slab should be
free of alkaline salts, and excessive carbonation or laitance prior to
the flooring installation.
ASTM
F710 also states that a concrete slab surface pH test reading shall be taken
at the same frequency and at each location in which a moisture test is performed.
A maximum pH reading of 9 is allowed unless the flooring or adhesive
manufacturer states otherwise.
Our
agency performs pH testing using both electronic pH meters and pH
indicator paper.
Pre
Test:
Prior
to selecting test methods for any given project, it is recommended
that the manufacturer(s) of floor coverings, coatings and adhesives
selected for the project be contacted. In order to protect warranty
rights, their specifications regarding acceptable test methods for
determining suitability and dryness of a concrete slab should be
followed.
|

|
|
Photo
courtesy of PCA |
Decision:
Too
often a decision to install floor coverings or coatings is based on
poor information or the simple demand to meet a schedule. If a
concrete substrate has a moisture vapor emission level, in-situ
relative humidity, or a pH level in excess of that which can be
tolerated by the flooring material, the losses are rarely limited to
the flooring itself. The tenant may end up, at best, with an eyesore,
at worst there may be a trip or slip and fall hazard with dire
financial consequences. The need to vacate a floor after move-in,
while repairs are made, can be extremely costly and for many industries
the loss of revenues can exceed
the value of the floor by a vast magnitude.
It
is the opinion of this agency that a combination of these tests,
performed concurrently in a subject building, offers the greatest
depth of data in decisions that may be made based on
such data. Please
us our contact form or call us at
404-504-8900 if you would like to discuss
commissioning our firm's consulting, testing, inspections, or other services. |